Lokpal Bill: Debate Starts in Rajya Sabha

The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Bill, 2011, was moved for consideration and passage in Rajya Sabha on Thursday by Minister of State for Parliamentary Affairs V Narayanasamy. The bill has already been passed by Lok Sabha late in the evening on Tuesday. The UPA does not enjoy a majority in the Rajya Sabha. Several political parties, including certain UPA allies, are opposed to some provisions of the bill. “I hope that everyone will come around. We will have to carry everybody and pass the bill,” Union Minister Minister V Narayanasamy said. Starting a discussion in the House explaining the features of the bill, the minister said "I hope that everyone will come around. We will have to carry everybody and pass the bill." However, the Trinamool Congress was firm in its demand for deletion of Lokayukta provision from Lokpal Bill. It is likely to press for amendment in Rajya Sabha. Trinamul, which has 6 members in the 243-member Upper House where the Congress and its allies do not have majority, wants removal of the provisions relating to the setting up of Lokayuktas in the state which is contained in the Bill passed by Lok Sabha. Mr. Narayanasamy said it has been made clear that the Lokayukta aspect will not come into force without consent of the state. Asked if the need for a Joint Session of Parliament for passage of Lokpal Bill would arise if it failed in Rajya Sabha, he said, "I don't visualise that situation." The debate on the bill is going on and it can not be confirmed at this stage whether it would get a clear passage or a joint session of both the Houses is required.   

New Lokpal Bill: What is Bothering the Leaders?

Irrespective of Parties, two things are bothering the political leaders in the government introduced new Lokpal Bill. One is the provision for constituting Lokayuktas in states and the other one is the section 24 of the new Lokpal Bill. The section 24 gives the power to presiding officers to act against ministers and MPs on the basis of the Lokpal indicting them for graft. The bill allows presiding officers to act on the basis of a Lokpal report even before a trial is completed. The Lok Sabha speaker or chairman of Rajya Sabha is required to table the Lokpal report and inform the Lokpal about the action being taken — or not taken — against the members concerned. The procedure has been prescribed in cases where at "the conclusion of investigation, the findings of the Lokpal disclose the commission of an offence under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, by a public servant... (The) Lokpal may file a case in the Special Court and shall send a copy of the report", says section 24 of the Lokpal Bill. With the bill stating that presiding officers will tell the Lokpal about "action taken or proposed to be taken on the basis of the report", the political class finds itself under increased threat. This provision is sure to attract several amendments with MPs pointing out that the bill does not even state the need for the trial process to be completed. The scheduled debate on Lokpal Bill in the Parliament on 27, 28 and 29 December are expected to hover around these two points, with the politicos trying to do away or minimize these two provisions.

Lokpal Bill Introduced: MPs Ask Why Undue Haste

Even as a comprehensive debate on the new Lokpal Bill introduced today in Parliament is scheduled for 27, 28 and 29 December, legislators from various parties opposed the very concept and timing of the Lok Pal Bill. Though different MPs criticised the government and Anna Hazare on various grounds, the primary criticism of govt was around undue haste in tabling the lokpal bill in the House while Anna was criticised for bullying the government on the lokpal issue and trying to dictate the Parliament. Many parties were also unhappy over attempt to bring the Prime Minister under its purview and making it mandatory for states to form Lokayuktas. The inclusion of minorities' quota in the bill was also opposed by some and favoured by some parties. However, the government rejected the opposition of the legislators with Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee saying, "It is for the 545 members of the Lok Sabha to decide on the bill. It is not undue haste. There is nothing illegal." Various parties, including BJP, Shiv Sena, RJD, AIMIM and AIADMK, opposed introduction of the bill in the current form and wanted the government to revise it. Parties like RJD, Samajwadi Party, AIMIM, AIADMK opposed bringing the Prime Minister under the purview of a body which would be "accountable to nobody". BJP, JD(U), BJD, AIADMK, DMK and CPI(M) objected to a provision in the Lokpal Bill, claiming that it made it "mandatory" for states to set up Lokayuktas and was an "attack" on the federal structure. Shiv Sena opposed the very concept of Lokpal saying that it is nothing but demeaning the parliamentary democracy.     Video Source: ibnlive    

Lokpal Bill: Salient Features at a Glance

The following are the salient features of the proposed anti-graft Lokpal bill introduced by the government in the Lok Sabha on Thursday: Lokpal and its role: The bill proposes to establish autonomous and independent institutions called Lokpal at the central level and and Lokayukta for states. These shall have powers of superintendence and direction for holding a preliminary inquiry, causing an investigation to be made and prosecution of offences in respect of complaints under any law for the prevention of corruption. Structure: The Lokpal will consist of a chairperson and a maximum of eight members of which fifty percent shall be judicial members. Fifty percent of members shall be from amongst Scheduled Caste (SC), Scheduled Tribe (ST) and Other Backward Classes (OBC), minorities and women. It has an inquiry wing for conducting the preliminary inquiry and a separate independent prosecution wing. Officers of the Lokpal will include the secretary, director of prosecution, director of inquiry and other officers. Process of selection: The selection of chairperson and members of Lokpal shall be through a selection committee consisting of prime minister, Lok Sabha speaker, Lok Sabha leader of opposition, chief justice of India or a sitting Supreme Court judge nominated by chief justice. Eminent jurist to be nominated by the president of India. A search committee to assist selection committee in the process of selection. Fifty percent of members of search committee shall be from amongst SC, ST, OBCs, minorities and women. Jurisdiction: Prime minister has been brought under the purview of the Lokpal with specific exclusions. Lokpal can not hold any inquiry against the prime minister if allegations relate to international relations, external and internal security of the country, public order, atomic energy and space. Any decision of Lokpal to initiate preliminary inquiry or investigation against prime minister shall be taken only by the full bench with a 3/4th majority. Such proceedings shall be held in camera. Its jurisdiction to include all categories of public servants including Group 'A', 'B', 'C' and 'D' officers and employees of government. On complaints referred by Lokpal, the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) will send its report in respect of Group 'A' and 'B' officers back to Lokpal for further decision. With respect to Group 'C' and 'D' employees, the CVC will proceed further in exercise of its own powers under the CVC act subject to reporting and review by Lokpal. All entities receiving donations from foreign sources in the context of the Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA) in excess of Rs.10 lakh per year are brought under the jurisdiction of the Lokpal. Lokpal will not be able to initiate suo moto inquiries. Other significant features of the Bill: No prior sanction shall be required for launching prosecution in cases enquired by Lokpal or initiated on the direction and with the approval of Lokpal. Provisions for confiscation of property acquired by corrupt means, even while prosecution is pending. Lokpal to be final appellate authority on all decisions by public authorities relating to provision of public services and redressal of grievances containing findings of corruption. Lokpal to have power of superintendence and direction over any investigation agency including Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) for cases referred to them. Source: India Today.  

ORR Becomes Death Trap for VIP Sons

City Outer Ring Road (ORR) once again proved death trap for VIP Sons with two accidents on Tuesday, one of them involving fatalities. While former Congress minister Komatireddy Venkat Reddy's son was killed in one, three others were hurt in a vehicle pileup. Pratheek Reddy, son of the minister and two of his young friends became the latest victims of the tricky Outer Ring Road (ORR) near Kollur in Medak district. It was only a few months ago that former cricketer Mohammed Azharuddin lost his son in a bike mishap on the ORR in Cyberabad. Ayazuddin was riding a sports motorcycle along with his cousin Ajmal, when their bike crashed on Hyderabad's Outer Ring Road.   Tuesday's accident snuffed out three lives while the condition of another, who was in the car and was grievously injured, is said be critical.  Nineteen year old Pratheek Reddy was studying first year BTech at CBIT in Gandipet. He, along with his classmates Sujeet Kumar, Chandra Reddy and Arohan Reddy, was returning to Hyderabad from his college in his Skoda car (AP 24 AH 9999). According to locals, the youngsters were driving the car at a very high speed on the ORR service road. Minutes after they entered the ORR at the outskirts of Kollur, two sheep strayed across their path, forcing them to swerve.The driver lost control and smashed the car into the divider. postmortem was performed on Pratheek Reddy's body, which was then shifted to their house. Chief minister N Kiran Kumar Reddy, deputy chief minister Damodar Rajanarasimha, Union minister for petroleum S Jaipal Reddy and TDP chief N Chandrababu Naidu were among those who extended condolences to the bereaved families                                                                           SOURCE SNEHA TV