Center May Opt For Three State Theory

The UPA government at the centre seems to in quandary over the contentious separate Telangana demand getting more complicated day by day. While Telangana people want a separate state with Hyderabad as its capital, seemandhra leaders are not ready to part with Hyderabad, in case the state is bifurcated. Realizing that Hyderabad is becoming a major bone of contention between the regions, the party high command wants champion the three state theory.

Congress sources claimed that this is one of the options that is being considered and is part of the report that PCC president Botsa Satyanarayana submitted to the high command last week. The confidential report submitted by Botsa to the party general secretary Mr. Gulam Nabi Azad is said to have categorically mentioned that Rayalaseema people would not like to sail with Andhra region in case there was any division. Botsa had reportedly indicated in his report that the separate Rayalaseema demand would surge forth once the high command takes a decision in favor of carving Telangana state.

The sources claimed the trifurcation of the state would eliminate all the claims of other regions over Hyderabad as it is not possible to keep the city as the joint capital for three states. Even though Seemandhra leaders are getting ready to meet Azad as a team from Samaikhyandhra, Azad told the media in New Delhi on Thursday that he had invited separate groups from Rayalaseema and coastal Andhra.

Significantly, minor irrigation minister T G Venkatesh also said that though he is a staunch supporter of samaikyandhra, he would go in for separate Rayalaseema state if the division was 'thrust on us'. "Establishing three capitals for the three regions is the best option to avoid the division. When J&K has two capitals, why can't we? Even Maharashtra has overcome the Vidharbha issue by deciding to convene the Assembly from Nagpur for three months," he said.

Eloborating further on the topic, Mr. Venkatesh said that the three capitals would develop into independent cities in ten years time. "Let us review the situation after ten years. Since every region has a separate capital, division of the state, if people wanted, would not be a painful decision, at least as painful as it feels now," he said. Stressing the need for a second capital in Rayalaseema as compensation for its loss in 1956, Venkatesh added that he would demand an economic package for Rayalaseema if one was announced to Telangana.

Education minister S Sailajanath also said there would not be a separate Rayalaseema team for talks with Azad. "We all will participate as the team of Samaikhyandhra peoples' representatives. If anybody wants to demand separate Rayalaseema, they can do so separately. Anything that leads to bifurcation of state is not negotiable," Sailajanath said. However, the T-leaders are firm on their demand. "We are not bothered about the number of states and their capitals. What we want is a Telangana state with Hyderabad as the capital," said Nizamabad MP Madhu Goud Yaski.

Modi Is Not Our PM: Owaisi

MIM is a recognized state political party based in the Indian state of Telangana, with its head office in the old city of Hyderabad, which has its roots in the Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen founded in 1927. Unlike most of the regional and national level parties, MIM party leaders ‘fight’ only for the well-being of Muslims, whereas no other party has such communal feelings. In their each and every speech, MIM leaders speak only about Muslims. If these leaders are here to fight for Muslims, then why there are no development works are happening in old city area for decades. Akbaruddin Owaisi faced criticism for making hate remarks on Narendra Modi and Hindus. Recently, his elder brother Asaduddin Owaisi made some notorious annotations. In a one-on-one debate between BJP spokesperson Sambit Patra and Asaduddin Owaisi on the topic of demonetization in a popular Hindi channel, the former left no stone unturned in exposing the latter’s communal designs. Owaisi claimed how most of the Muslim community still remains unbanked and that demonetization has caused severe inconvenience to Muslims. He even went on to say that ATM’s in Muslim-dominated areas weren’t fed enough money. He indirectly alleged that the Modi government hadn’t done anything for Muslims. Even after being pressurized Owaisi didn’t call Narendra Modi as his Prime Minister. He went on said, “Your Prime Minister…” On the other hand, Sambit spoke wisely and called Owaisi a leader of small stature because he talked only of Muslims. He said that no area was Muslim or Hindu and that all areas belonged to India. Owaisi was constantly quoting an RBI report, to which Sambit challenged him to show where the RBI had used the word ‘Muslim’. Sambit even said that if a Muslim leader speaks of Muslims it’s not an issue, but the moment a VHP leader speaks of Hindus people go crazy accusing them of imposing the Hindutva ideology. The most amazing of his counters was to Owaisi’s claims of Muslims not having been brought into the banking system. Sambit said that when banks or ATMs are to be opened in Muslim areas leaders like Owaisi shout that banking is un-Islamic and that Muslims should refrain from it! This video of debate between Sambit Patra and Asaduddin Owaisi is going viral in social media.